CONSOLIDATED LIST OF REFERENCES for "Conservatism as heresy" By John Ray
ADORNO, T. W., FRENKEL-BRUNSWIK, ELSE, LEVINSON, D. J. $L SANFORD, R. N. The Authoritarian Personality. N.Y.: Harper & Row, 1950.
ALPERT, R. & SARGENT, S. S. Conservatism-radicalism measured by immediate emotional reactions. J. Soc. Psych., 1941, 14, 181-186.
ANDERSON, D. S. & WESTERN, J. S. An inventory to measure Students' Attitudes. St. Lucia, Brisbane: University of Queensland Press, 1967.
ANDERSON, J. Studies in Empirical Philosophy. Sydney: Angus and Robertson, 1962.
BAGLEY, C. Racial prejudice and the conservative personality: A British sample. Polit. Stud., 1970, 18, 134-141.
BAGLEY, C., WILSON, G. D. & BOSHIER, R. W. The Conservatism scale: a factor structure comparison of English, Dutch and New Zealand samples. J. Soc. Psychol., 1970, 77, 139-140.
BASS, B. M. Development and Evaluation of a Scale for Measuring Social Acquiescence. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1956, 53, 296-299.
BEDFORD, I. White Australia: The fear of others. Politics, 1970, 5, 224-227. BELL, W. Anomie, social isolation and the class structure. Sociometry, 1957, 20, 105-116.
BERKOWITZ, L. Sex and violence: we can't have it both ways. Psychology Today, 1971, 5, 7, 14-23.
BERKOWITZ, N. H. & WOLKON, G. H. A forced-choice form of the 'F' scale free of acquiescent response set. Sociometry, 1964, 27, 54-65.
BERTOCCI, P. A. Foundations of personalistic psychology. In B. B. Wolman & E. NageI (eds.) Scientific Psychology: N.Y.: Basic Books, 1965.
BESWICK, D. C. & HILLS, M. D. An Australian Ethnocentrism Scale. Aust. Journal Psychology, 1969, 21, 211-226.
BINDER, A. Statistical Theory, Annual Review Psychology, 1964, 15, 277-310.
BODDY, M. The Bulletin, 1971.
BONJEAN, C. M., HILL, R. J. & McLEMORE, S. D. "Continuities in measurement, 1959-1963." Social Forces, 1965, 43, 532-535.
BOSHIER, R. W. A study of the relationship between self-concept and conservatism. J. Soc. Psychol., 1969, 77, 139-140.
BOSHIER, R. W. To rotate or not to rotate: The question of the conservatism scale. Br. J. Soc. Clin. Psychol., 1972, 11, 313-323.
BRINE, R. Quoted in Time, 5 April 1971.
BROWN, R. Social psychology. N.Y.: Free Press, 1965.
BRUCE, M. Factors Affecting Intelligence Test Performance of Whites and Negroes in the Rural South. Archives of Psychology, No. 252, 1940.
BURKE, E. Reflections on the revolution in France, 1790. Any edition.
BUROS, O. K. The Sixth Mental Measurement Yearbook. New Jersey: The Gryphon Press, 1965.
BURT; C. Brain and consciousness. Br. j. Psychol., 1963, 59, 55-69.
CARR, L. G. The Srole items and acquiescence. Amer. Sociological Rev., 1971, 36, 287-293.
CHRISTENSON, L. In The Report of the Commission on Obscenity and Pornography, 1970.
CHRISTIE, R. Eysenck's treatment of the personality of Communists. Psych. Bull., 1956, 53, 411-438.
CHRISTIE, R. Some Abuses of Psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 1956, 53, 439-51.
CHRISTIE, R. & COOK, P. A guide to published literature relating to the authoritarian personality through 1956. Jnl. Psych., 1958, 45, 171-199.
CHRISTIE, R., HAVEL, JOAN & SEIDENBERG, B. Is the F scale Irreversible? J. Abnorm. & Soc. Psychol., 1956, 56, 141-158.
CHRISTIE, R. & JAHODA, MARIE (Eds.), Studies in the scope and method of 'the authoritarian personality'. Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press, 1954.
CLARK, J. P. Measuring alienation within a social system. Amer. Sociological Rev., 1959, 24, 849-852.
CLOUD, J. & VAUGHAN, G. M. Using balanced scales to control acquiescence. Sociometry, 1969, 33, 193-202.
COHEN, S. Folk Devils and Moral Panics. St. Albans: Paladin, 1973.
CONGALTON, A. A. Status and prestige in Australia. Melbourne: Cheshire, 1967.
COUCH, A. & KENISTON, K. Yeasayers and naysayers: Agreeing response set as a personality variable. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1960, 60, 15I-174.
COURT, J. H. In SHILTON, L. (ed.), No, No, Calcutta. Adelaide: Brolga, 1971.
COURT, J. H. Changing Community Standards. Adelaide: Lutheran Publishing House, 1972a.
COURT, J. H. The function of the Christian within the realm of the on-going power struggle. Lutheran Theological Journal, 1972 b, 6, 95-104.
COURT, J. H. Pornography-Personal and Societal Effects. Geigy Symposium paper in 'Liberation Movements and Psychiatry', U.N.S.W., 1973.
CRONBACH, L. J. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests, Psychometrika, 1951, 16, 297-334.
CROWNE, D. P. & MARLOWE, D. The Approval Motive. New York: Wiley, 1964.
DALEY, E. T.V. Week, September 1970.
DAVIS, K. E., & BRAUGHT, G. N. Exposure to pornography, character and sexual deviance: a retrospective survey. Tech. Reports of the Commission on Obscenity and Pornography, 1970, 7, 173-244.
DEAN, D. Alienation: Its meaning and measurement. Amer. Sociological Rev., 1961, 26, 753-758.
DE ROUGEMONT, D. The Myths o f Love. Pantheon Books, 1963.
DEPARTMENT OF IMMIGRATION. Australia's Immigration policy: Government Printer, Canberra, 1970.
DURKHEIM, E. Suicide. Glencoe, Illinois: Free Press, 1951.
DWORKIN, G. 'Paternalism', in R. A. Wesserstrom (ed.), Morality and the Law, California: Wadsworth, 1971, 107-126.
ECKHARDT, W. Prejudice; Fear, hate or mythology? Journal of Human Relations, 1968, 16, 32-41.
ECKHARDT, M., MANNING, C., MORGAN, L., SUBOTNIK 8L TINKER, L. J. Militarism in our culture today. Journal of Human Relations, 1967, 15, 932-937.
ECKHARDT, W. & NEWCOMBE, A. G. Militarism, personality and other social attitudes. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 1969, 13, 210-219.
EISENMAN, R. Teaching about the authoritarian personality: Effects on moral judgment. Psych. Record, 1970, 20, 33-40.
ELMS, A. C. Those little old ladies in tennis shoes are no nuttier than anybody else: it turns out. Psychology Today, 1970, 3, 27.
ENCEL, S. The study of militarism in Australia. A.N.Z. Jnl. Sociology, 1967, 3,2-18.
ERIKSON, K. T. Wayward Puritans: a study in the sociology o f deviance. N.Y.: Wiley, 1966.
EYSENCK, H. J. The psychology of politics. London: Routledge, 1954:
EYSENCK, H. J. A short questionnaire for the measurement of two dimensions of personality. Journal o f Applied Psychology, 1958, 42, 14-I7.
EYSENCK, H. J. The biological basis of personality. Springfield, III: Thomas, 1967.
EYSENCK, H. J. Social attitudes and social class. British J. Soc. Clin. Psychol., 1971,10,201-212.
EYSENCK, H. J. Psychology is about people. Allen Lane: The Penguin Press, 1972.
EYSENCK, H. J. & EYSENCK, S. B. G. Personality structure and measurement. London: Routledge, 1969.
EYSENCK, H. J. & RACHMAN, S. The causes and cures of neurosis. San Diego: Knapp, 1965.
FEILING, K. Principles of conservatism. Polit. Quarterly, 1953, 24, 129 ff.
FESHBACH, S. The drive-reducing function of fantasy behaviors. J. Abn. Soc. Psychol., 1955, 50, 1, 3-12.
FRENCH, ELIZABETH & ERNEST, R. R. The relation between authoritarianism and acceptance of military ideology. Journal Pers., 1955, 24, 181-191.
FROMM, E. Escape from freedom. N.Y.: Rinehart, 1941.
FROMM, E. Man for himself. N.Y. : Rinehart, 1947.
FROMM, E. The Sane Society. N.Y.: Rinehart, 1955.
GARRETT, H. E. Reply to Psychology Class 338 (Honours Section). American Psychologist, 1969, 24, 390-391.
GERBNER, G. Cultural Indicators: The case of violence in television drama. In MARLOWE, L. Basic topics in Social Psychology. Boston: Holbrook Press, 1972.
GOLDSTEIN, H. J., KANT, H. S., JUDD, L. L., RICE, C. J. & GREEN, R. Exposure to pornography and sexual behaviour in deviant and normal groups. Tech. Reports of the Commission on Obscenity and Pornography, 1970, 751-90.
GOOSSEN, C. V. The Goossen hidden intelligence test. Public Opinion Quarterly, 1950, 14, 759-766.
GORDON L. V. Gordon Personal Profile. New York: World Book Company 1953.
GRAHAM, H. D. The paradox of American violence: A historical appraisal. Annals Amer. Acad. Polit. & Social Science, 1970, 391, 74-82.
GREENWALD, H. J. & SATOW, Y. A. A short social desirability scale. Psych. Reports, 1970, 27, 131-135.
GUMMER, J. S. The Permissive Society. London: Cassell, 1971.
HAAG, E. VAN DEN. Addendum to Jensen. American Psychologist, 1969, 24, 1042.
HAIMAN, F. S. A revised scale for the measurement of open mindedness. Speech Monographs, 1964, 31, 97-102.
HALL, C. S. & LINDZEY, G. Theories of personality (2nd ed.). N.Y. : Wiley, 1970.
HAMILTON, R. A research note on the mass support for 'tough' military initiatives. Amer. Sociolog. Rev., 1968, 33, 439-445.
HAMPDEN-TURNER, C. & WHITTEN, P. Morals Left and Right. Psychology Today, 1971, 4, 39-76.
HAYNES, J. Problems of censorship. Interchange, 1970, 2, 4.
HEBB, D. O. The Organization of Behaviour. New York: Wiley, 1949.
HILL, M. A. & LINK, W. C. In Report of the Commission on Obscenity and Pornography, 1970.
HOLBROOK, D. The Masks of Hate. London: Pergamon, 1972.
HOLLANDER, E. P. Authoritarianism and leadership choice in a military setting. J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 1954, 49, 365-370.
HOLLANDER, E. P. The reliability of peer nominations under various conditions of administration. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1957, 41, 85-90.
HOOGVELT, A. M. M. Ethnocentrism, authoritarianism and Powellism. Race, 1969, 11, 1-12.
HOYT, C. J. Note on a simplified method of computing test reliability. Education and Psychological Measurement, 1941, 1, 93-95.
HUGHES, A. H. Problems and solutions in measuring psychological dispositions. Paper delivered at Australian UNESCO seminar on mathematics in the social sciences, 1968.
HYNES, V. A. F-scale GAMIN, and public school behaviour. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1956, 47, 321-328.
JACKSON, D. N. & MESSICK, S. J. Content and style in personality assessment. Psychological Bulletin, 1958, 55, 4, 243-252.
JENSEN, A. R. Social Class, Race and Genetics: Implications for Education. American Educational Research Journal, 1968, 5, 1-42.
JENSEN, A. R. How Much Can We Boost IQ. and Scholastic Achievement? Harvard Educational Review, 1969 a, 39,,1-123.
JENSEN, A. R. Criticism or Propaganda? American Psychologist, 1969b, 24, 1040-1041.
JOSEPHSON, M. Man alone: Alienation in Modern Society. N.Y.: Dell, 1962.
JOURARD, S. M. Moral indignation: A correlate of denied dislike of parents' traits. J. Consult. Psychology, 1954, 15, 59-60.
KENISTON, K. Young radicals: Notes on committed youth. N.Y.: Harcourt Brace, 1968.
KERLINGER, F. N. Social attitudes and their criterial referents: A Structural theory. Psych. Rev., 1967, 74, 110-122.
KERLINGER, F. N. The structure and content of social attitude referents: A preliminary study. Educ. & Psychol. Meas., 1972, 32, 613-630.
KIRSCHT, J. P. & DILLEHAY, R. C. Dimensions of authoritarianism. Lexington: Univ. Kentucky Press, 1967.
KOHLBERG, L. Stages in the development of moral thought and action. N.Y.: Holt Rinehart, 1969.
KORNHAUSER, W. The politics of mass society. Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press, 1959.
KNOPFELMACHER, F. & ARMSTRONG, D. B. The relation between authoritarianism, ethnocentrism and religious denomination among Australian adolescents. American Catholic Sociological Review, 1963, 24, 99-114.
LA PIERE, R. T. Attitudes and actions. Social Forces, 1934, 13, 230-237.
LEE, R. E. & WARR, P. B. The development and standardization of a balanced 'F' scale. J. General. Psychol., 1969, 81, 109-129.
LEWIS, C. S. Riddell Memorial Lectures, Durham. Published as The Abolition of Man. London: O.U.P., 1943.
LEWIS, C. S. Mere Christianity. London: Fontana, 1955.
LIEBERT, R. M., NEALE, J. M. & DAVIDSON, E. S. The Early Window. N.Y.: Pergamon, 1972.
LIPSET, S. M. Political man. N.Y.: Doubleday, 1960.
LIPSET, S. M. Working class authoritarianism: A reply to Miller and Riessman. Brit. Jnl. Sociology, 1961, 12, 277-281.
LIPSET, S. M. Students and politics. In Lipset, S. M. & Wolins, S. S. (eds.) The Berkeley Student Revolt. N.Y.: Doubleday, 1965.
LIPSITZ, L. Working class authoritarianism: A re-evaluation. Amer. Sociolog. Rev., 1965, 30, 103-109.
LONGFORD, LORD. Pornography: The Longford Report. London: Coronet Books, 1972.
LYNCH, P. The evolution of a policy: Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra, 1971.
LYNN, R. Attention, Arousal and the Orientation Reaction. London: Pergamon, 1966.
MADARIAGA, S. DE. Englishmen, Frenchmen, Spaniards: An essay in comparative psychology 2nd ed. London: Patman, 1970.
MADDISON, D. Mental Health in the permissive society. Med. J. Aust., 1971, 58, 908-914.
MARCUSE, H. Reason and revolution. N.Y.: Oxford, 1941.
MARTIN, J. Response style and the measurement of conformity and deviation. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. Univ. of W.A., 1964 a.
MARTIN, J. Acquiescence: measurement and theory. British Journal o f Social and Clinical Psychology, 1964 b, 3, 216-225.
MARTIN, J. & RAY, J. J. Anti-authoritarianism: An indicator of pathology. Aust. - J. Psychol., 1972, 24, 13-18.
MARTIN, J. G. & WESTIE , F. R. The tolerant personality. Amer. Sociolog. Rev., 1952, 24, 521-528.
MASLING, M. How neurotic is the authoritarian? Journal Abnormal and Social ,r Psychology, 1954, 49, 316-318.
MASLING, M., GREER, F. LOYAL & GILMORE, R. Status, authoritarianism and sociometric choice. J. Soc. Psych., 1955, 41, 297-310.
MAY, R. Love and Will. N.Y.: Norton and Co., 1969.
MAZE, J. R. Do intervening variables intervene? Psychological Review, 1954, 61, - 226-234.
MAZE, J. The concept of attitude. Inquiry, 1973, 16, 168-205.
McCLOSKY, H. Conservatism and personality. Amer. Pol. Sci. Rev., 1958, 52, 27-45.
McCLOSKY, H. & SCHARR, J. H. Psychological dimensions of anomy. Amer. Sociological Rev., 1965, 30, 14-41.
McDILL, E. L. Anomie, authoritarianism, prejudice and socio-economic status: An attempt at clarification. Social Forces, 1961, 39, 239-245.
McELWAIN, D. W. Personal communication to J. Ray, 1970.
McGEE, R. K. The relationship between response styles and personality variables. I: The measurement of response acquiescence. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1962, 64, 229-233.
McQUEEN, P. & BROWNING, C. The Intelligence and Educational Achievement of a Matched Sample of White and Negro Students. School and Society, 1960, 88, 327-329.
McQUITTY, L. C. Elementary factor analysis. Psychological Reports, 1961, 9, 71-78.
MEIER, D. L. & BELL, W. Anomia and differential access to the achievement of life goals. Amer. Sociological Rev., 1959, 24, 189-202.
MERTON, R. K. Mass Persuasion. N.Y.: Harper, 1946.
MERTON, R. K. Social Theory and Social Structure. Gleneoe, Ill.: Free Press, 1957.
MILL, J. S. On Liberty. London: Parker, 1859.
MILLS, C. W. White Collar. N.Y.: Oxford, 1951.
MILLER, S. M. & RIESSMAN, F. Working class authoritarianism: A critique of Lipset. Brit. Jnl. Sociology, 1981, 12, 263-276.
MITCHELL, J. V. An analysis of the factorial dimensions of the achievement motivation construct. J. Educ. Psychol., 1961, 52, 179-187.
MIZRUCHI, E. H. Social structure in a small city. Amer. Sociological Rev., 1960, 25, 645-647.
MOWRER, O. H. The crisis in psychiatry and religion. Princeton, N.J.: Van Nostrand Co., 1961.
NEAL, A. C. & RETTIG, S. On the multidimensionality of alienation. Amer. Sociological Rev., 1967, 32, 54-64.
NETTLER, G. A measure of alienation. Amer. Sociological Rev., 1957, 23, 672 ff.
NEVILLE, R. In The Longford Report, 1972.
NEWS. San Antonio, Texas, 14 November, 1973.
NIETZSCHE, F. Beyond good and evil (vol. 12 of The complete works. Ed.: O. LEVY) Foulis, Edinburgh, 1911.
OLSEN, M. E. Alienation and political opinions. Public Opinion Quarterly, 1965, 29, 200 ff.
OLSEN, M. E. Two categories of political alienation. Social Forces, 1969, 47, 288-299.
ORPEN, C. A cross cultural investigation of the relationship between conservatism and personality. Journal o f Psychology, 1972, 81, 297-300.
PACKER, H. Quoted in Time, 5 April 1971.
PATTERSON, J. R. & WILSON, J. D. Anonymity, occupation & conservatism. J. Soc. Psych., 1969, 78, 263-266.
PAVLOV, I. P. Selected Works. Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House, 1932.
PEABODY, D. Attitude content and agreement set in scales of authoritarianism, dogmatism, anti-Semitism and economic conservatism. J. Abnorm. & Soc. Psychol., 1961, 63, 1-11.
PEABODY, D. Authoritarianism scales and response bias. Psych. Bull., 1966, 65, 11-23.
PERLMUTTER, H. V. Some characteristics of the xenophilic personality, J. Psychology, 1954, 38, 291-300.
PINTNER, R. Intelligence Testing. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1931, Chapter 20.
PLACE, U. T. Burt on brain and consciousness. Bull. Brit. psychol. Soc., 1969, 22, 285-92.
PROTHRO, E. T. & MELIKIAN, L. The California public opinion scale in an authoritarian culture. Public Opinion Quarterly, 1953, 17, 353-362.
RAMBO, W. W. Attitude measurement: The problem of predictability. Percept. Mot. Skills, 1970, 30, 43-48.
RAY, J.J. (1970a) The development and validation of a balanced Dogmatism scale. Australian Journal of Psychology, 22, 253-260.
RAY, J.J. (1970b) Christianism.... The Protestant ethic among unbelievers. J. Christian Education, 13, 169-176.
RAY, J.J. (1971a) "A new measure of conservatism" -- Its limitations. British Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology, 10, 79-80.
RAY, J.J. (1971b) The questionnaire measurement of social class. Australian & New Zealand J. Sociology 7(April), 58-64.
RAY, J.J. (1971c) An "Attitude to Authority" scale. Australian Psychologist, 6, 31-50.
RAY, J.J. (1971d) Ethnocentrism: Attitudes and behaviour. Australian Quarterly, 43, 89-97.
RAY, J.J. (1972a) Are conservatism scales irreversible? British J. Social & Clinical Psychology 11, 346-352.
RAY, J.J. (1972b) A new reliability maximization procedure for Likert scales. Australian Psychologist 7, 40-46.
RAY, J.J. (1972c) Non-ethnocentric authoritarianism. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Sociology 8(June), 96-102.
RAY, J.J.(1972d) Acceptance of aggression and Australian voting preference. Australian Quarterly 44, 64-70.
RAY, J.J. (1972e) Militarism, authoritarianism, neuroticism and anti-social behavior. Journal of Conflict Resolution 16, 319-340.
RAY, J.J. (1972f) The measurement of political deference: Some Australian data. British Journal of Political Science 2, 244-251.
RAY, J.J. (1972g) A new balanced F scale -- And its relation to social class. Australian Psychologist 7, 155-166.
RAY, J.J. (1973a) Antisemitic types in Australia. Patterns of Prejudice 7(1), 6-16.
RAY, J. J. Acquiescence and the correlation between positive and negative halves of balanced scales. Unpublished paper available from author; 1973 b.
RAY, J.J. & DORATIS, D. (1972) Religiocentrism and ethnocentrism: Catholic and Protestant in Australian schools. Sociological Analysis 32, 170-179.
RAY, J.J. & SUTTON, A.J. (1972) Alienation in an Australian University. Journal of Social Psychology, 86, 319-320.
Report of the Committee on Homosexual Offences and Prostitution, London, H.M.S.O. 1957.
Report 'Putting Asunder: A divorce law for contemporary society'. London, S.P.C.K. 1964.
Report of the Commission on Obscenity and Pornography, Bantam Books, 1970.
Report of the U.S. Surgeon-General 'Television and Growing-Up: the impact of televised violence'. 1972.
RIESSMANN, D. The Lonely Crowd. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1950.
ROBERTS, A. H. & ROKEACH, M. Anomic authoritarianism and prejudice. Amer. J. Sociology, 1956, 62, 355-358.
RODGER, R. S. Type 1 errors and their decision basis. British Journal Mathematical & Stat. Psychology, 1967, 20, 187-204.
ROKEACH, M. The open and closed mind. New York: Basic Books, 1960.
ROKEACH, M. & HANLEY, C. Care and carelessness in psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 1956, 53, 183-186.
RORER, L. G. The great response style myth. Psych. Bull., 1965, 63, 129-156.
ROSENBERG, M. Misanthropy and political ideology. Amer. Sociological Rev., 1956, 21, 690-695.
RUDIN, S. A. The relationship between rational and irrational authoritarianism. Journal o f Psychology, 1961, 52, 179-183.
SCHAEFFER, F. A. Escape from Reason. London: IVF, 1968.
SCHNEIDER, J. F. The conservatism scale: Independent of SD? British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 1973, 12, 90-91.
SCHOENBERGER, R. A. Conservatism, personality and political extremism. American Political Science Review, 1968, 62, 868-877.
SEEMAN, M. On the meaning of alienation. Amer. Sociological Rev., 1959, 24, 783-791.
SHERIDAN, KATHLEEN, & SHACK, J. R. Personality correlates of the undergraduate volunteer subject. J. Psych., 1970, 76, 23-26.
SHILS, E. A, Authoritarianism 'Right' and 'Left'. In R. Christie and Marie Jahoda (eds.), Studies in the method and scope of 'the authoritarian personality'. Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press, 1954.
SIMMONS, J. L. Some intercorrelations among 'alienation' measures. Social Forces, 1966, 44, 370-372.
SOREL, G. Reflections on violence (Trans. T. E. Hulme) : Allen & Unwin, London, 1915.
SPOCK, B. Decent and Indecent. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1972.
SROLE, L. Social integration and certain corollaries: An exploratory study. Amer. Sociological Rev., 1956, 21, 709-716.
STACEY, B. G. & GREEN, R. T. Working class conservatism: A review and an empirical Study. Brit. Jnl. Soc. Clin. Psychol., 1971, 10, 10-26.
STREUNING, E. L. & RICHARDSON, A. H. A factor analytic exploration of the alienation, anomia and authoritarianism domain. Amer. Sociological Review, 1965, 30, 768-776.
SVALASTOGA, K. Prestige, class and mobility. Copenhagen: Gyldendal, 1959.
SYMONDS, P. M. The ego and the self. N.Y.: Appleton-Century, 1951.
TANSER, H. A. The Settlement of Negroes in Kent County, Ontario. Chatham, Ontario: Shephard Publishing Co., 1939.
TAUSS, W. Validation of a questionnaire for neurotic manifestation. Australian Journal o f Psychology, 1964, 15, 191-198.
TAUSS, W. A note on the prevalence of mental disturbance. Australian Journal of Psychology, 1967, 19, 121-123.
TINBERGEN, N. The study of instinct. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1951.
TiTUS, H. E. F-Scale validity considered against peer nomination criteria. Psychological Record, 1968, 18, 395-403.
TiTUS, H. E. & HOLLANDER, E. P. The California F scale in psychological research 1950-1955. Psych. Bull., 1957, 54, 47-74.
TYLER, L. E. The Psychology of Human Differences. New York: Appleton, Century Crofts, 1965, Chapter 12.
UNWIN, J. D. Sex and Culture. London: Oxford U.P., 1934.
WALKER, C. E. Erotic stimuli and the aggressive sexual offender. Tech. Reports of the Commission on Obscenity and Pornography, 1970, 7, 91-148.
WELSH, G. S. Factor dimensions A and R. In G. S. Welsh & W. G. Dahlstrom (eds.), Basic readings on the MMPI in psychology and medicine. Minneapolis: Univ. of Minnesota Press, 1956.
WHITEHOUSE, M. Lecture to International Congress of the Union Internationale d'Action Morale et Sociale, Bonn. 3 November 1971.
WILKINS, L. T. Social Deviance: Social policy, action and research. London: Tavistock, 1964.
WILSON, G. D. Is there a general factor in social attitudes? Evidence from a factor analysis of the conservatism scale. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 1970, 9, 101-107.
WILSON, G. D. (ed.) The psychology o f conservatism. London: Academic Press, 1973,
WILSON, G. D. & NIAS, D. K. B. Measurement of social attitudes: A new approach. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 1972, 35, 827-834.
WILSON, G. D. & PATTERSON, J. R. A new measure of conservatism. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 1968, 7, 264-269.
WINDEYER, JUDGE. Aust. L. J. R., 1967/68, 41.
WOLPE, J., SALTER, A. & REYANA, L. J. The Conditioning Therapies: the challenge in psychotherapy. N.Y.: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1964.
WORCHEL, P. Social ideology and reactions to international events. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 1967, 11 (4), 414-430.
YAFFE, M. Research Survey in The Longford Report, 1972.
In brief
Home (Index page)
Postings from Brisbane, Australia by John J. Ray (M.A.; Ph.D.) -- former member of the Australia-Soviet Friendship Society, former anarcho-capitalist and former member of the British Conservative party.
IN BRIEF:
It's the shared hatred of the rest of us that unites Islamists and the Left.
American liberals don't love America. They despise it. All they love is their own fantasy of what America could become. They are false patriots.
The Democratic Party: Con-men elected by the ignorant and the arrogant
The Republicans are the gracious side of American politics. It is the Democrats who are the nasty party
The characteristic emotion of the Leftist is not envy. It's rage
"And I will bless them that bless thee, and curse him that curseth thee: and in thee shall all families of the earth be blessed" -- Genesis 12:3
My (Gentile) opinion of antisemitism: The Jews are the best we've got so killing them is killing us.
I have always liked the story of Gideon (See Judges chapters 6 to 8) and it is surely no surprise that in the present age Israel is the Gideon of nations: Few in numbers but big in power and impact.
"The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left." -- Ecclesiastes 10:2 (NIV)
“My reading of history convinces me that most bad government results from too much government.” -- Thomas Jefferson
Leftists think that utopia can be coerced into existence -- so no dishonesty or brutality is beyond them in pursuit of that "noble" goal
"Much that passes as idealism is disguised hatred or disguised love of power" -- Bertrand Russell
Evan Sayet: The Left sides "...invariably with evil over good, wrong over right, and the behaviors that lead to failure over those that lead to success." (t=5:35+ on video)
Some useful definitions:
If a conservative doesn't like guns, he doesn't buy one. If a liberal doesn't like guns, he wants all guns outlawed.
If a conservative is a vegetarian, he doesn't eat meat. If a liberal is a vegetarian, he wants all meat products banned for everyone.
If a conservative is down-and-out, he thinks about how to better his situation. A liberal wonders who is going to take care of him.
If a conservative doesn't like a talk show host, he switches channels. Liberals demand that those they don't like be shut down.
If a conservative is a non-believer, he doesn't go to church. A liberal non-believer wants any mention of God and religion silenced. (Unless it's a foreign religion, of course!)
If a conservative decides he needs health care, he goes about shopping for it, or may choose a job that provides it. A liberal demands that the rest of us pay for his.
Leftists are classic weak characters. They dish out abuse by the bucketload but cannot take it when they get it back. Witness the Loughner hysteria.
Death taxes: You would expect a conscientious person, of whatever degree of intelligence, to reflect on the strange contradiction involved in denying people the right to unearned wealth, while supporting programs that give people unearned wealth.
America is no longer the land of the free. It is now the land of the regulated -- though it is not alone in that, of course
The Leftist motto: "I love humanity. It's just people I can't stand"
Why are Leftists always talking about hate? Because it fills their own hearts
Envy is a strong and widespread human emotion so there has alway been widespread support for policies of economic "levelling". Both the USA and the modern-day State of Israel were founded by communists but reality taught both societies that respect for the individual gave much better outcomes than levelling ideas. Sadly, there are many people in both societies in whom hatred for others is so strong that they are incapable of respect for the individual. The destructiveness of what they support causes them to call themselves many names in different times and places but they are the backbone of the political Left
The large number of rich Leftists suggests that, for them, envy is secondary. They are directly driven by hatred and scorn for many of the other people that they see about them. Hatred of others can be rooted in many things, not only in envy. But the haters come together as the Left.
Leftists hate the world around them and want to change it: the people in it most particularly. Conservatives just want to be left alone to make their own decisions and follow their own values.
The failure of the Soviet experiment has definitely made the American Left more vicious and hate-filled than they were. The plain failure of what passed for ideas among them has enraged rather than humbled them.
Ronald Reagan famously observed that the status quo is Latin for “the mess we’re in.” So much for the vacant Leftist claim that conservatives are simply defenders of the status quo. They think that conservatives are as lacking in principles as they are.
The shallow thinkers of the Left sometimes claim that conservatives want to impose their own will on others in the matter of abortion. To make that claim is however to confuse religion with politics. Conservatives are in fact divided about their response to abortion. The REAL opposition to abortion is religious rather than political. And the church which has historically tended to support the LEFT -- the Roman Catholic church -- is the most fervent in the anti-abortion cause. Conservatives are indeed the one side of politics to have moral qualms on the issue but they tend to seek a middle road in dealing with it. Taking the issue to the point of legal prohibitions is a religious doctrine rather than a conservative one -- and the religion concerned may or may not be characteristically conservative. More on that here
Some Leftist hatred arises from the fact that they blame "society" for their own personal problems and inadequacies
The Leftist hunger for change to the society that they hate leads to a hunger for control over other people. And they will do and say anything to get that control: "Power at any price". Leftist politicians are mostly self-aggrandizing crooks who gain power by deceiving the uninformed with snake-oil promises -- power which they invariably use to destroy. Destruction is all that they are good at. Destruction is what haters do.
Leftists are consistent only in their hate. They don't have principles. How can they when "there is no such thing as right and wrong"? All they have is postures, pretend-principles that can be changed as easily as one changes one's shirt
A Leftist assumption: Making money doesn't entitle you to it, but wanting money does.
"Politicians never accuse you of 'greed' for wanting other people's money -- only for wanting to keep your own money." --columnist Joe Sobran (1946-2010)
Leftist policies are candy-coated rat poison that may appear appealing at first, but inevitably do a lot of damage to everyone impacted by them.
I often wonder why Leftists refer to conservatives as "wingnuts". A wingnut is a very useful device that adds versatility wherever it is used. Clearly, Leftists are not even good at abuse. Once they have accused their opponents of racism and Nazism, their cupboard is bare. Similarly, Leftists seem to think it is a devastating critique to refer to "Worldnet Daily" as "Worldnut Daily". The poverty of their argumentation is truly pitiful
The Leftist assertion that there is no such thing as right and wrong has a distinguished history. It was Pontius Pilate who said "What is truth?" (John 18:38). From a Christian viewpoint, the assertion is undoubtedly the Devil's gospel
"If one rejects laissez faire on account of man's fallibility and moral weakness, one must for the same reason also reject every kind of government action." - Ludwig von Mises
The naive scholar who searches for a consistent Leftist program will not find it. What there is consists only in the negation of the present.
Because of their need to be different from the mainstream, Leftists are very good at pretending that sow's ears are silk purses
Among people who should know better, Leftism is a character defect. Leftists HATE success in others -- which is why notably successful societies such as the USA and Israel are hated and failures such as the Palestinians can do no wrong.
A Leftist's beliefs are all designed to pander to his ego. So when you have an argument with a Leftist, you are not really discussing the facts. You are threatening his self esteem. Which is why the normal Leftist response to challenge is mere abuse.
Because of the fragility of a Leftist's ego, anything that threatens it is intolerable and provokes rage. So most Leftist blogs can be summarized in one sentence: "How DARE anybody question what I believe!". Rage and abuse substitute for an appeal to facts and reason.
Their threatened egos sometimes drive Leftists into quite desperate flights from reality. For instance, they often call Israel an "Apartheid state" -- when it is in fact the Arab states that practice Apartheid -- witness the severe restrictions on Christians in Saudi Arabia. There are no such restrictions in Israel.
If the Palestinians put down their weapons, there'd be peace. If the Israelis put down their weapons, there'd be genocide.
Because their beliefs serve their ego rather than reality, Leftists just KNOW what is good for us. Conservatives need evidence.
“Absolute certainty is the privilege of uneducated men and fanatics.” -- C.J. Keyser
“Hell is paved with good intentions" -- Boswell’s Life of Johnson of 1775
"Almost all professors of the arts and sciences are egregiously conceited, and derive their happiness from their conceit" -- Erasmus
THE FALSIFICATION OF HISTORY HAS DONE MORE TO IMPEDE HUMAN DEVELOPMENT THAN ANY ONE THING KNOWN TO MANKIND -- ROUSSEAU
"Seest thou a man wise in his own conceit? there is more hope of a fool than of him" (Proverbs 26: 12). I think that sums up Leftists pretty well.
Eminent British astrophysicist Sir Arthur Stanley Eddington is often quoted as saying: "Not only is the universe stranger than we imagine, it is stranger than we can imagine." It was probably in fact said by his contemporary, J.B.S. Haldane. But regardless of authorship, it could well be a conservative credo not only about the cosmos but also about human beings and human society. Mankind is too complex to be summed up by simple rules and even complex rules are only approximations with many exceptions.
Politics is the only thing Leftists know about. They know nothing of economics, history or business. Their only expertise is in promoting feelings of grievance
Socialism makes the individual the slave of the state – capitalism frees them.
MESSAGE to Leftists: Even if you killed all conservatives tomorrow, you would just end up in another Soviet Union. Conservatives are all that stand between you and that dismal fate.
Many readers here will have noticed that what I say about Leftists sometimes sounds reminiscent of what Leftists say about conservatives. There is an excellent reason for that. Leftists are great "projectors" (people who see their own faults in others). So a good first step in finding out what is true of Leftists is to look at what they say about conservatives! They even accuse conservatives of projection (of course).
The research shows clearly that one's Left/Right stance is strongly genetically inherited but nobody knows just what specifically is inherited. What is inherited that makes people Leftist or Rightist? There is any amount of evidence that personality traits are strongly genetically inherited so my proposal is that hard-core Leftists are people who tend to let their emotions (including hatred and envy) run away with them and who are much more in need of seeing themselves as better than others -- two attributes that are probably related to one another. Such Leftists may be an evolutionary leftover from a more primitive past.
Leftists seem to believe that if someone like Al Gore says it, it must be right. They obviously have a strong need for an authority figure. The fact that the two most authoritarian regimes of the 20th century (Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia) were socialist is thus no surprise. Leftists often accuse conservatives of being "authoritarian" but that is just part of their usual "projective" strategy -- seeing in others what is really true of themselves.
Following the Sotomayor precedent, I would hope that a wise older white man such as myself with the richness of that experience would more often than not reach a better conclusion than someone who hasn’t lived that life.
IQ and ideology: Most academics are Left-leaning. Why? Because very bright people who have balls go into business, while very bright people with no balls go into academe. I did both with considerable success, which makes me a considerable rarity. Although I am a born academic, I have always been good with money too. My share portfolio even survived the GFC in good shape. The academics hate it that bright people with balls make more money than them.
If I were not an atheist, I would believe that God had a sense of humour. He gave his chosen people (the Jews) enormous advantages -- high intelligence and high drive -- but to keep it fair he deprived them of something hugely important too: Political sense. So Jews to this day tend very strongly to be Leftist -- even though the chief source of antisemitism for roughly the last 200 years has been the political Left!
And the other side of the coin is that Jews tend to despise conservatives and Christians. Yet American fundamentalist Christians are the bedrock of the vital American support for Israel, the ultimate bolthole for all Jews. So Jewish political irrationality seems to be a rather good example of the saying that "The LORD giveth and the LORD taketh away". There are many other examples of such perversity (or "balance"). The sometimes severe side-effects of most pharmaceutical drugs is an obvious one but there is another ethnic example too, a rather amusing one. Chinese people are in general smart and patient people but their rate of traffic accidents in China is about 10 times higher than what prevails in Western societies. They are brilliant mathematicians and fearless business entrepreneurs but at the same time bad drivers!
The above is good testimony to the accuracy of the basic conservative insight that almost anything in human life is too complex to be reduced to any simple rule and too complex to be reduced to any rule at all without allowance for important exceptions to the rule concerned
"Why should the German be interested in the liberation of the Jew, if the Jew is not interested in the liberation of the German?... We recognize in Judaism, therefore, a general anti-social element of the present time... In the final analysis, the emancipation of the Jews is the emancipation of mankind from Judaism.... Indeed, in North America, the practical domination of Judaism over the Christian world has achieved as its unambiguous and normal expression that the preaching of the Gospel itself and the Christian ministry have become articles of trade... Money is the jealous god of Israel, in face of which no other god may exist". Who said that? Hitler? No. It was Karl Marx. See also here and here and here. For roughly two centuries now, antisemitism has, throughout the Western world, been principally associated with Leftism (including the socialist Hitler) -- as it is to this day. See here.
Leftists call their hatred of Israel "Anti-Zionism" but Zionists are only a small minority in Israel
Some of the Leftist hatred of Israel is motivated by old-fashioned antisemitism (beliefs in Jewish "control" etc.) but most of it is just the regular Leftist hatred of success in others. And because the societies they inhabit do not give them the vast amount of recognition that their large but weak egos need, some of the most virulent haters of Israel and America live in those countries. So the hatred is the product of pathologically high self-esteem.
Eugenio Pacelli, a righteous Gentile, a true man of God and a brilliant Pope
Conservatives, on the other hand could be antisemitic on entirely rational grounds: Namely, the overwhelming Leftism of the Diaspora Jewish population as a whole. Because they judge the individual, however, only a tiny minority of conservative-oriented people make such general judgments. The longer Jews continue on their "stiff-necked" course, however, the more that is in danger of changing. The children of Israel have been a stiff necked people since the days of Moses, however, so they will no doubt continue to vote with their emotions rather than their reason.
Fortunately for America, though, liberal Jews there are rapidly dying out through intermarriage and failure to reproduce. And the quite poisonous liberal Jews of Israel are not much better off. Judaism is slowly returning to Orthodoxy and the Orthodox tend to be conservative.
"With their infernal racial set-asides, racial quotas, and race norming, liberals share many of the Klan's premises. The Klan sees the world in terms of race and ethnicity. So do liberals! Indeed, liberals and white supremacists are the only people left in America who are neurotically obsessed with race. Conservatives champion a color-blind society" -- Ann Coulter
Who said this in 1968? "I am not, and never have been, a man of the right. My position was on the Left and is now in the centre of politics". It was Sir Oswald Mosley, founder and leader of the British Union of Fascists
The term "Fascism" is mostly used by the Left as a brainless term of abuse. But when they do make a serious attempt to define it, they produce very complex and elaborate definitions -- e.g. here and here. In fact, Fascism is simply extreme socialism plus nationalism. But great gyrations are needed to avoid mentioning the first part of that recipe, of course.
Politicians are in general only a little above average in intelligence so the idea that they can make better decisions for us that we can make ourselves is laughable
A quote from the late Dr. Adrian Rogers, 1931–2005: "You cannot legislate the poor into freedom by legislating the wealthy out of freedom. What one person receives without working for, another person must work for without receiving. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them, and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for, that my dear friend, is about the end of any nation. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it."
The Supreme Court of the United States is now and always has been a judicial abomination. Its guiding principles have always been political rather than judicial. It is not as political as Stalin's courts but its respect for the constitution is little better. Some recent abuses: The "equal treatment" provision of the 14th amendment was specifically written to outlaw racial discrimination yet the court has allowed various forms of "affirmative action" for decades -- when all such policies should have been completely stuck down immediately. The 2nd. amendment says that the right to bear arms shall not be infringed yet gun control laws infringe it in every State in the union. The 1st amendment provides that speech shall be freely exercised yet the court has upheld various restrictions on the financing and display of political advertising. The court has found a right to abortion in the constitution when the word abortion is not even mentioned there. The court invents rights that do not exist and denies rights that do.
"Some action that is unconstitutional has much to recommend it" -- Elena Kagan, nominated to SCOTUS by Obama
The U.S. Constitution is neither "living" nor dead. It is fixed until it is amended. But amending it is the privilege of the people, not of politicians or judges
The book, The authoritarian personality, authored by T.W. Adorno et al. in 1950, has been massively popular among psychologists. It claims that a set of ideas that were popular in the "Progressive"-dominated America of the prewar era were "authoritarian". Leftist regimes always are authoritarian so that claim was not a big problem. What was quite amazing however is that Adorno et al. identified such ideas as "conservative". They were in fact simply popular ideas of the day but ones that had been most heavily promoted by the Left right up until the then-recent WWII. See here for details of prewar "Progressive" thinking.
Frank Sulloway, the anti-scientist
The basic aim of all bureaucrats is to maximize their funding and minimize their workload
A lesson in Australian: When an Australian calls someone a "big-noter", he is saying that the person is a chronic and rather pathetic seeker of admiration -- as in someone who often pulls out "big notes" (e.g. $100.00 bills) to pay for things, thus endeavouring to create the impression that he is rich. The term describes the mentality rather than the actual behavior with money and it aptly describes many Leftists. When they purport to show "compassion" by advocating things that cost themselves nothing (e.g. advocating more taxes on "the rich" to help "the poor"), an Australian might say that the Leftist is "big-noting himself". There is an example of the usage here. The term conveys contempt. There is a wise description of Australians generally here
I imagine that few of my readers will understand it, but I am an unabashed monarchist. And, as someone who was born and bred in a monarchy and who still lives there (i.e. Australia), that gives me no conflicts at all. In theory, one's respect for the monarchy does not depend on who wears the crown but the impeccable behaviour of the present Queen does of course help perpetuate that respect. Aside from my huge respect for the Queen, however, my favourite member of the Royal family is the redheaded Prince Harry. The Royal family is of course a military family and Prince Harry is a great example of that. As one of the world's most privileged people, he could well be an idle layabout but instead he loves his life in the army. When his girlfriend Chelsy ditched him because he was so often away, Prince Harry said: "I love Chelsy but the army comes first". A perfect military man! I doubt that many women would understand or approve of his attitude but perhaps my own small army background powers my approval of that attitude.
I imagine that most Americans might find this rather mad -- but I believe that a constitutional Monarchy is the best form of government presently available. Can a libertarian be a Monarchist? I think so -- and prominent British libertarian Sean Gabb seems to think so too! Long live the Queen! (And note that Australia ranks well above the USA on the Index of Economic freedom. Heh!)
Throughout Europe there is an association between monarchism and conservatism. It is a little sad that American conservatives do not have access to that satisfaction. So even though Australia is much more distant from Europe (geographically) than the USA is, Australia is in some ways more of an outpost of Europe than America is! Mind you: Australia is not very atypical of its region. Australia lies just South of Asia -- and both Japan and Thailand have greatly respected monarchies. And the demise of the Cambodian monarchy was disastrous for Cambodia
Throughout the world today, possession of a U.S. or U.K. passport is greatly valued. I once shared that view. Developments in recent years have however made me profoundly grateful that I am a 5th generation Australian. My Australian passport is a door into a much less oppressive and much less messed-up place than either the USA or Britain
Some ancient wisdom for Leftists: "Be not righteous overmuch; neither make thyself over wise: Why shouldest thou die before thy time?" -- Ecclesiastes 7:16
People who mention differences in black vs. white IQ are these days almost universally howled down and subjected to the most extreme abuse. I am a psychometrician, however, so I feel obliged to defend the scientific truth of the matter: The average African adult has about the same IQ as an average white 11-year-old and African Americans (who are partly white in ancestry) average out at a mental age of 14. The American Psychological Association is generally Left-leaning but it is the world's most prestigious body of academic psychologists. And even they have had to concede that sort of gap (one SD) in black vs. white average IQ. 11-year olds can do a lot of things but they also have their limits and there are times when such limits need to be allowed for.
Jesse Jackson: "There is nothing more painful to me at this stage in my life than to walk down the street and hear footsteps and start thinking about robbery -- then look around and see somebody white and feel relieved." There ARE important racial differences.
Some Jimmy Carter wisdom: "I think it's inevitable that there will be a lower standard of living than what everybody had always anticipated," he told advisers in 1979. "there's going to be a downward turning."
R.I.P. Augusto Pinochet. Pinochet deposed a law-defying Marxist President at the express and desperate invitation of the Chilean parliament. He pioneered the free-market reforms which Reagan and Thatcher later unleashed to world-changing effect. That he used far-Leftist methods to suppress far-Leftist violence is reasonable if not ideal. The Leftist view that they should have a monopoly of violence and that others should follow the law is a total absurdity which shows only that their hate overcomes their reason
Joe McCarthy was eventually proved right after the fall of the Soviet Union. To accuse anyone of McCarthyism is to accuse them of accuracy!
The KKK was intimately associated with the Democratic party. They ATTACKED Republicans!
Did William Zantzinger kill poor Hattie Carroll?
America's uncivil war was caused by trade protectionism. The slavery issue was just camouflage, as Abraham Lincoln himself admitted.
The "steamroller" above who got steamrollered by his own hubris. Spitzer is a warning of how self-destructive a vast ego can be -- and also of how destructive of others it can be.
Many people hunger and thirst after righteousness. Some find it in the hatreds of the Left. Others find it in the love of Christ. I don't hunger and thirst after righteousness at all. I hunger and thirst after truth. How old-fashioned can you get?
Heritage is what survives death: Very rare and hence very valuable
Big business is not your friend. As Adam Smith said: "People of the same trade seldom meet together, even for merriment and diversion, but the conversation ends in a conspiracy against the public, or in some contrivance to raise prices. It is impossible indeed to prevent such meetings, by any law which either could be executed, or would be consistent with liberty or justice. But though the law cannot hinder people of the same trade from sometimes assembling together, it ought to do nothing to facilitate such assemblies; much less to render them necessary
“How can I accept the Communist doctrine, which sets up as its bible, above and beyond criticism, an obsolete textbook which I know not only to be scientifically erroneous but without interest or application to the modern world? How can I adopt a creed which, preferring the mud to the fish, exalts the boorish proletariat above the bourgeoisie and the intelligentsia, who with all their faults, are the quality of life and surely carry the seeds of all human achievement? Even if we need a religion, how can we find it in the turbid rubbish of the red bookshop? It is hard for an educated, decent, intelligent son of Western Europe to find his ideals here, unless he has first suffered some strange and horrid process of conversion which has changed all his values.” ― John Maynard Keynes
Some wisdom from "Bron" Waugh: "The purpose of politics is to help them [politicians] overcome these feelings of inferiority and compensate for their personal inadequacies in the pursuit of power"
"There are countless horrible things happening all over the country, and horrible people prospering, but we must never allow them to disturb our equanimity or deflect us from our sacred duty to sabotage and annoy them whenever possible"
The urge to pass new laws must be seen as an illness, not much different from the urge to bite old women. Anyone suspected of suffering from it should either be treated with the appropriate pills or, if it is too late for that, elected to Parliament [or Congress, as the case may be] and paid a huge salary with endless holidays, to do nothing whatever"
"It is my settled opinion, after some years as a political correspondent, that no one is attracted to a political career in the first place unless he is socially or emotionally crippled"
As well as being an academic, I am an army man and I am pleased and proud to say that I have worn my country's uniform. Although my service in the Australian army was chiefly noted for its un-notability, I DID join voluntarily in the Vietnam era, I DID reach the rank of Sergeant, and I DID volunteer for a posting in Vietnam. So I think I may be forgiven for saying something that most army men think but which most don't say because they think it is too obvious: The profession of arms is the noblest profession of all because it is the only profession where you offer to lay down your life in performing your duties. Our men fought so that people could say and think what they like but I myself always treat military men with great respect -- respect which in my view is simply their due.
A real army story here
Two lines below of a famous hymn that would be incomprehensible to Leftists today ("honor"? "right"? "freedom?" Freedom to agree with them is the only freedom they believe in)
First to fight for right and freedom,
And to keep our honor clean
It is of course the hymn of the USMC -- still today the relentless warriors that they always were.
The kneejerk response of the Green/Left to people who challenge them is to say that the challenger is in the pay of "Big Oil", "Big Business", "Big Pharma", "Exxon-Mobil", "The Pioneer Fund" or some other entity that they see, in their childish way, as a boogeyman. So I think it might be useful for me to point out that I have NEVER received one cent from anybody by way of support for what I write. As a retired person, I live entirely on my own investments. I do not work for anybody and I am not beholden to anybody. And I have NO investments in oil companies, mining companies or "Big Pharma"
UPDATE: Despite my (statistical) aversion to mining stocks, I have recently bought a few shares in BHP -- the world's biggest miner, I gather. I run the grave risk of becoming a speaker of famous last words for saying this but I suspect that BHP is now so big as to be largely immune from the risks that plague most mining companies. I also know of no issue affecting BHP where my writings would have any relevance. The Left seem to have a visceral hatred of miners. I have never quite figured out why.
I have no hesitation in saying that the single book which has influenced me most is the New Testament. And my Scripture blog will show that I know whereof I speak. Some might conclude that I must therefore be a very confused sort of atheist but I can assure everyone that I do not feel the least bit confused. The New Testament is a lighthouse that has illumined the thinking of all sorts of men and women and I am deeply grateful that it has shone on me.
I am rather pleased to report that I am a lifelong conservative. Out of intellectual curiosity, I did in my youth join organizations from right across the political spectrum so I am certainly not closed-minded and am very familiar with the full spectrum of political thinking. Nonetheless, I did not have to undergo the lurch from Left to Right that so many people undergo. At age 13 I used my pocket-money to subscribe to the "Reader's Digest" -- the main conservative organ available in small town Australia of the 1950s. I have learnt much since but am pleased and amused to note that history has since confirmed most of what I thought at that early age. Conservatism is in touch with reality. Leftism is not.
I imagine that the RD are still sending mailouts to my 1950s address
Most teenagers have sporting and movie posters on their bedroom walls. At age 14 I had a map of Taiwan on my wall.
"Remind me never to get this guy mad at me" -- Instapundit
I have used many sites to post my writings over the years and many have gone bad on me for various reasons. So if you click on a link here to my other writings you may get a "page not found" response if the link was put up some time before the present. All is not lost, however. All my writings have been reposted elsewhere. If you do strike a failed link, just take the filename (the last part of the link) and add it to the address of any of my current home pages and -- Voila! -- you should find the article concerned.
It seems to be a common view that you cannot talk informatively about a country unless you have been there. I completely reject that view but it is nonetheless likely that some Leftist dimbulb will at some stage aver that any comments I make about politics and events in the USA should not be heeded because I am an Australian who has lived almost all his life in Australia. I am reluctant to pander to such ignorance in the era of the "global village" but for the sake of the argument I might mention that I have visited the USA 3 times -- spending enough time in Los Angeles and NYC to get to know a fair bit about those places at least. I did however get outside those places enough to realize that they are NOT America.
If any of the short observations above about Leftism seem wrong, note that they do not stand alone. The evidence for them is set out at great length in my MONOGRAPH on Leftism.
"Intellectual" = Leftist dreamer. I have more publications in the academic journals than almost all "public intellectuals" but I am never called an intellectual and nor would I want to be. Call me a scholar or an academic, however, and I will accept either as a just and earned appellation
My academic background
My full name is Dr. John Joseph RAY. I am a former university teacher aged 65 at the time of writing in 2009. I was born of Australian pioneer stock in 1943 at Innisfail in the State of Queensland in Australia. I trace my ancestry wholly to the British Isles. After an early education at Innisfail State Rural School and Cairns State High School, I taught myself for matriculation. I took my B.A. in Psychology from the University of Queensland in Brisbane. I then moved to Sydney (in New South Wales, Australia) and took my M.A. in psychology from the University of Sydney in 1969 and my Ph.D. from the School of Behavioural Sciences at Macquarie University in 1974. I first tutored in psychology at Macquarie University and then taught sociology at the University of NSW. My doctorate is in psychology but I taught mainly sociology in my 14 years as a university teacher. In High Schools I taught economics. I have taught in both traditional and "progressive" (low discipline) High Schools. Fuller biographical notes here
I completed the work for my Ph.D. at the end of 1970 but the degree was not awarded until 1974 -- due to some academic nastiness from Seymour Martin Lipset and Fred Emery. A conservative or libertarian who makes it through the academic maze has to be at least twice as good as the average conformist Leftist. Fortunately, I am a born academic.
Despite my great sympathy and respect for Christianity, I am the most complete atheist you could find. I don't even believe that the word "God" is meaningful. I am not at all original in that view, of course. Such views are particularly associated with the noted German philosopher Rudolf Carnap. Unlike Carnap, however, none of my wives have committed suicide
Very occasionally in my writings I make reference to the greats of analytical philosophy such as Carnap and Wittgenstein. As philosophy is a heavily Leftist discipline however, I have long awaited an attack from some philosopher accusing me of making coat-trailing references not backed by any real philosophical erudition. I suppose it is encouraging that no such attacks have eventuated but I thought that I should perhaps forestall them anyway -- by pointing out that in my younger days I did complete three full-year courses in analytical philosophy (at 3 different universities!) and that I have had papers on mainstream analytical philosophy topics published in academic journals
Even a stopped clock is right twice a day and there is JUST ONE saying of Hitler's that I rather like. It may not even be original to him but it is found in chapter 2 of Mein Kampf (published in 1925): "Widerstaende sind nicht da, dass man vor ihnen kapituliert, sondern dass man sie bricht". The equivalent English saying is "Difficulties exist to be overcome" and that traces back at least to the 1920s -- with attributions to Montessori and others. Hitler's metaphor is however one of smashing barriers rather than of politely hopping over them and I am myself certainly more outspoken than polite. Hitler's colloquial Southern German is notoriously difficult to translate but I think I can manage a reasonable translation of that saying: "Resistance is there not for us to capitulate to but for us to break". I am quite sure that I don't have anything like that degree of determination in my own life but it seems to me to be a good attitude in general anyway
COMMENTS: I have gradually added comments facilities to all my blogs. The comments I get are interesting. They are mostly from Leftists and most consist either of abuse or mere assertions. Reasoned arguments backed up by references to supporting evidence are almost unheard of from Leftists. Needless to say, I just delete such useless comments.
You can email me here (Hotmail address). In emailing me, you can address me as "John", "Jon", "Dr. Ray" or "JR" and that will be fine -- but my preference is for "JR"
DETAILS OF REGULARLY UPDATED BLOGS BY JOHN RAY:
"Tongue Tied"
"Dissecting Leftism" (Backup here)
"Australian Politics"
"Education Watch International"
"Political Correctness Watch"
"Greenie Watch"
Western Heart
BLOGS OCCASIONALLY UPDATED:
"Marx & Engels in their own words"
"A scripture blog"
"Recipes"
"Some memoirs"
To be continued ....
Coral reef compendium.
Queensland Police
Australian Police News
Paralipomena (3)
Of Interest
Dagmar Schellenberger
My alternative Wikipedia
BLOGS NO LONGER BEING UPDATED
"Food & Health Skeptic"
"Eye on Britain"
"Immigration Watch International".
"Leftists as Elitists"
Socialized Medicine
OF INTEREST (2)
QANTAS -- A dying octopus
BRIAN LEITER (Ladderman)
Obama Watch
Obama Watch (2)
Dissecting Leftism -- Large font site
Michael Darby
Paralipomena (2)
AGL -- A bumbling monster
Telstra/Bigpond follies
Optus bungling
Vodafrauds (vodafone)
Bank of Queensland blues
There are also two blogspot blogs which record what I think are my main recent articles here and here. Similar content can be more conveniently accessed via my subject-indexed list of short articles here or here (I rarely write long articles these days)
Mirror for "Dissecting Leftism"
Alt archives
Longer Academic Papers
Johnray links
Academic home page
Academic Backup Page
General Backup
General Backup 2
My alternative Wikipedia
Selected reading
MONOGRAPH ON LEFTISM
CONSERVATISM AS HERESY
Rightism defined
Leftist Churches
Leftist Racism
Fascism is Leftist
Hitler a socialist
Leftism is authoritarian
James on Leftism
Irbe on Leftism
Beltt on Leftism
Lakoff
Van Hiel
Sidanius
Kruglanski
Pyszczynski et al.
Cautionary blogs about big Australian organizations:
TELSTRA
OPTUS
VODAFONE
AGL
St. George bank
Bank of Queensland
Queensland Police
Australian police news
QANTAS, a dying octopus
INTERESTING BLOGS by others
(My frequent reads are starred)
10 o'clock scholar
Agitator*
AMCGLTD
American Thinker
ASTUTE BLOGGERS
Baby Troll
Bad Eagle
Belmont Club*
Betsy's Page
Bill Keezer
Blackfive
Bleeding Brain
BLOGGER NEWS
Blowhards
Bob McCarty
Booker Rising
Brian Leiter scrutinized
Brothers Judd*
Brussels Journal
Bureaucrash
Candle in dark
Catallarchy*
Classical Values
Clayton Cramer*
Climate audit
Climate science
Colby Cosh
Cold Fury
Common-sense & Wonder*
Community Pride Childcare
(Clearwater, Florida)
Confront the Left
Conservative Grapevine
Conservative Oasis
Conservative Voice
Conservatives Anonymous
Critical Mass
Cronaca*
Daily Caller
Danegerus
Dead Cat Bounce
Dean's World
Dhimmi Watch
Discover the networks
Discriminations
Dodge Blog
Dr Helen
Dr Sanity
Drunkablog
Ed Driscoll
Dyspepsia
Eddy Rants
Electric Venom
Endiana
Enter Stage Right
Eugene Undergound
Evangelical Ecologist
Fighting in the Shade
Fourth Rail
Free Patriot
Gates of Vienna
Gay and Right
Gene Expression*
Ghost of Flea
Global warming & Climate
Gold Dog
Grumpy Old Sod
Hack Wilson
Hall of Record
Heretical Ideas
Hitler's Leftism
Hugh Hewitt
Hummers & Cigarettes
IMAO
Icecap
Inductivist
Instapunk
Intellectual Conservative
Interested Participant
Jihad Watch
Jim Kalb
Junk Food science
Junk Science
Just One Minute
KBJ
Knowledge is Power
Ladybird Deed
La Shawn
Laudator
Libertyphile
Lone Wacko
Lubos Motl
Luskin
MA firearm safety
Main Street Radical
Mangan
Margaret Thatcher Foundation
Maverick Philosopher
Medicine World
Michelle Malkin
Moderate Voice
Moorewatch
National Center
National Scene
Neo Con Blogger
Never Yet Melted
New Zeal
Northeastern Intelligence Network
Not PC
On the Right Side
Orator
Overlawyered
Parable Man
ParaPundit*
Pedestrian Infidel
Poli Pundit
Prof Bainbridge
Promethean Antagonist
Qando
Qohel
Random Observations
Rand Simberg
Random Jottings
Red State
Rhodey
Rhymes with Right
Right Nation
Right Thinking
Right Wing news
Roadkill
Ron Hebron
Rottweiler
Schansberg
SCSU Scholars*
Sharp Blades
Sharp Knife
Should Know
Shrinkwrapped
Silent Running
Smallest Minority
Squander 2
Steve Sailer
Stop the ACLU
Stuart Buck
Talking Head
Tim Worstall
Truth and consequences
Two-Four Net
Urban Conservative
Urgent Agenda
Vdare blog
View from Right
Viking Pundit
Vodka Pundit
Watt's up with that
Western Standard
Bill Whittle
What If
WICKED THOUGHTS*
Wiki Law
Winds of Change
Wizbang
World of Reason
World Terrorism news
Education Blogs
Early Childhood Education
Education Bug
Eduwonk
Joanne Jacobs*
Marc Miyake*
Economics Blogs
Adam Smith
Arnold Kling
Chicago Boyz
Cafe Hayek
Econopundit
Environmental Economics
Jane Galt
S. Karlson
D. Luskin
Marginal Revolution
Mises Inst.
Australian Blogs
A E Brain
Brookes News
Catallaxy
Fortress Australia
Kev Gillett
Hissink File
ICJS*
Oz Conservative
Slattery
Tim Blair
WESTERN HEART*
Cyclone's Sketchblog
England
Anglo Austrian
Burning our Money
Campaign Against Political Correctness
England Project
Norm Geras
House of Dumb
IQ & PC
Limbic Nutrition
Majority Rights*
NHS Doctor
Policeman
Samizdata
Sean Gabb
Sterling Times
Englishman's Castle
Scotland
Freedom & Whisky
A Place to Stand
ISRAEL
IsraPundit
Steven Plaut
Think Israel
No comments:
Post a Comment